Back to Blog

What the Study Screener blog publishes

Editorial scope for this blog: reproducible screening workflows, honest notes on AI-assisted triage, tool comparisons grounded in product behavior, and links to step-by-step guides.

George Burchell
November 20, 2025
3 min read
Study Screener manual screening dashboard with title, abstract, and include or exclude decisions

If you landed here from search, start with the guides below—they contain screenshots, worked examples, and citations.

Start here: substantive guides

If you need…Read
First project setup, keyboard shortcuts, PRISMA exportsPaper screening tool: beginner’s step-by-step guide
RIS upload and screening mechanicsComplete guide to RIS file screening
Clear inclusion criteria before you screen thousands of rowsWhy “just read the abstracts” fails
AI triage vs dual manual screening (with literature)AI screening vs manual systematic review
Moving from Rayyan or comparing tools honestlyStudy Screener vs Rayyan

How this blog relates to the product

Study Screener ships two related but separate paths:

  1. Manual screening — shared project library, blinded reviewers, include / maybe / exclude, CSV and RIS exports (demo dashboard).
  2. AI-assisted screening — batch classification against your written criteria, confidence scores, optional PRISMA counts from job results (AI screening workspace).

Articles here are written by people building those flows. When something is unfinished (for example, no in-app deduplication on import), we say so—see the Rayyan comparison for a current limitations table.

Manual screening layout in Study Screener: study list, abstract, and decision buttons

Figure: Manual screening dashboard (demo data). Decisions are per reviewer; blinding hides teammates’ votes until your protocol allows unblinding.

Methods we anchor to

We routinely link to:

Corrections and guest material

Found a factual error or an outdated UI screenshot? Contact us with the post slug and we will update it.

We occasionally host short guest notes from librarians or methodologists; those posts are labeled in the byline. Everything else is in-house editorial unless stated otherwise.

Try the workflows (optional)


Last updated: May 2026. For search indexing, this page stays at /blog/welcome-to-our-blog; the homepage highlights newer guides instead of this index.

Related Articles

systematic review
paper screening

Paper screening tool for systematic review: a beginner’s step-by-step guide

Starting your first systematic review can make screening feel daunting. You may have thousands of records and a deadline. A paper screening tool turns that pile...

16 min read
systematic review
screening

Why 'Just Read the Abstracts' Is the Biggest Misconception in Evidence Screening

Why "Just Read the Abstracts" Is the Biggest Misconception in Evidence Screening TL;DR: Screening abstracts isn't a simple yes/no process—it's complex decision-...

4 min read
systematic review
AI automation

The One Research Task I'd Hand Over to AI Tomorrow

The One Research Task I'd Hand Over to AI Tomorrow TL;DR: Screening is the most time-consuming bottleneck in systematic reviews, and AI is perfectly suited to h...

7 min read

Ready to Streamline Your Systematic Review?

Experience the power of AI-assisted screening and cut your review time by up to 80%. Join thousands of researchers who trust our platform for their systematic reviews.

George Burchell - Systematic Review Expert

About the Author

Connect on LinkedIn

George Burchell

George Burchell is a specialist in systematic literature reviews and scientific evidence synthesis with significant expertise in integrating advanced AI technologies and automation tools into the research process. With over four years of consulting and practical experience, he has developed and led multiple projects focused on accelerating and refining the workflow for systematic reviews within medical and scientific research.

Systematic Reviews
Evidence Synthesis
AI Research Tools
Research Automation